<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Architecture on Todd W. Bucy — Research Blog</title><link>https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/tags/architecture/</link><description>Recent content in Architecture on Todd W. Bucy — Research Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/tags/architecture/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Productive Friction: The Variable You're Already Trying to Control</title><link>https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/blog/2026/05/productive-friction/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/blog/2026/05/productive-friction/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/images/blog/productive-friction/title.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Part 2 of a 3-article series on agent memory architecture. Part 1 made the cognitive-architecture argument that memory belongs in a categorically different component from the reasoning engine. This article names the formal variable that determines whether the architectural split is doing real work, and gives practitioners a diagnostic they can use on their own systems. Part 3 describes what the engineering commitments look like.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You cannot move a car on a perfectly smooth road with perfectly smooth tires. The engine is fine. The transmission is fine. The wheels rotate exactly as designed. Nothing is broken. The car doesn&amp;rsquo;t move because friction between tire and road is the medium through which rotational work becomes translational motion, and without it, the work has nothing to push against. The car doesn&amp;rsquo;t fail to accelerate. It has no purchase from which forward momentum is possible no matter how fast the wheels turn.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Latency Is the Enemy of Agency</title><link>https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/blog/2026/05/latency-is-the-enemy-of-agency/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/blog/2026/05/latency-is-the-enemy-of-agency/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why an Engineer with the Hardware in Front of Him Wants AI to Do Better&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/images/blog/latency-is-the-enemy-of-agency/title.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Personal note in a series that has been making architectural arguments. The architectural papers describe what the framework is. This piece describes why someone would build it. Specifically: why I built it, what about current AI deployment offends me as someone who actually understands the hardware, and what the architectural commitments come from.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Your Model Has Humanity's Cortex. It Needs Its Own Hippocampus.</title><link>https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/blog/2026/05/cortex-and-hippocampus/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/blog/2026/05/cortex-and-hippocampus/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Part 1 of a 3-article series on agent memory architecture. This article makes the cognitive-architecture argument: the model has the cortex part, humanity&amp;rsquo;s verbal and reasoning capacity in compressed form, but no working hippocampus of its own, and adding more text to its context will not give it one. Part 2 names the variable that determines whether the architectural alternative works. Part 3 describes what the engineering commitments actually look like.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>