<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hippocampus on Todd W. Bucy — Research Blog</title><link>https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/tags/hippocampus/</link><description>Recent content in Hippocampus on Todd W. Bucy — Research Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/tags/hippocampus/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Your Model Has Humanity's Cortex. It Needs Its Own Hippocampus.</title><link>https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/blog/2026/05/cortex-and-hippocampus/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://toddwbucy.github.io/toddwbucy_research_blog/blog/2026/05/cortex-and-hippocampus/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Part 1 of a 3-article series on agent memory architecture. This article makes the cognitive-architecture argument: the model has the cortex part, humanity&amp;rsquo;s verbal and reasoning capacity in compressed form, but no working hippocampus of its own, and adding more text to its context will not give it one. Part 2 names the variable that determines whether the architectural alternative works. Part 3 describes what the engineering commitments actually look like.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>